Our site uses cookies

I agree Our site saves small pieces of text information, called “cookies” on your device. Find out more in our cookie policy. You can disable the usage of cookies by changing the settings of your browser. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

Balancing forfeiture and fairness

The Forfeiture Act prevents any person who has unlawfully killed another from benefitting from the death they have caused.

But what happens when a broad application of the Act would lead to a disproportionate punishment? Associate Rebecca Waterhouse considers Amos v Mancini and the court's willingness to strive for fairness.

To read more, visit Spear's Wealth Management Magazine.

Related Expertise

Private Wealth

Related in brief posts

The Court of Protection and the vaccine: to administer or not to administer

The Court of Protection and the vaccine: to administer or not to administer - Nicola Boulter considers two recent Court of Protection decisions.

No-one expects a 1975 Act claim......

Two decisions under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act (enabling a spouse/civil partner and others, to bring a claim if a Will fails to make reasonable financial provision for that person) have produced very different results.

MEET | THE | EXPERTS: A Taxing Time or Time for Tax

March sees the launch of the Treasury Committee’s report ‘Tax after coronavirus’, Budget Day and a later release of tax related consultations and calls for evidence. Join our experts at 11am on 24 March to see how these developments may affect you.