Search
  • Who we are
    • View everyone
  • What we do
    Private Wealth
    • Art and Cultural Property
    • Entrepreneurs and family businesses
    • Non contentious probate
    • Philanthropy and charities
    • Taxation for international clients
    • Trusts in a commercial context
    • Wills and Estate Planning
    Immigration
    • Corporate Immigration
    • Work in the UK
    • Visit the UK
    • Live permanently in the UK
    • Study in the UK
    • Family in the UK
    • The UK and Europe
    • Entrepreneurs and Global Talent
    Dispute resolution
    • Contentious trusts and probate
    • Family governance and disharmony
    • MTG Resolution
    Real Estate
    Professional Practices
  • How we work
    • About us
    • News
    • Join us
  • What we think
  • Contact us
RESOLUTION
RECOMMENDS
Home / News / Fraudulent calumny – lies, damn lies and deceit

13 May 2022

Fraudulent calumny – lies, damn lies and deceit

Sophie Mazzier

What is THAT you might justifiably ask yourself? An archaic sounding term generally only stumbled upon in the wee small hours by law students revising for contentious probate exams, and while not quite as rare as hens’ teeth, the number of actions brought to challenge the validity of a will on these grounds is relatively small.

So what does fraudulent calumny involve?

Fraudulent calumny  involves one person poisoning a testator’s mind by making dishonest aspersions about another person’s character where the maligned person would, otherwise, be a natural beneficiary of the testator’s bounty. If the fraud is shown, the will is invalid.

The burden of proof in a fraudulent calumny claim is on the person who asserts it.  The essence is of such a claim “that the person alleged to have been poisoning the testator’s mind must either know that the aspersions are false or not care whether they are true or false”*.  In this case [David Whittle v. Sonia Whittle, Ray Ernest Spicer [2022] EWHC 925 (Ch)], the battle was between siblings – Sonia and her partner allegedly convinced her (and her brother David’s) father Gerald, that David was a violent thief, among other things.  After Gerald died, his will left a bequest of his cars (which Sonia had earlier told her father that David had stolen) to David and the residue of his estate to Sonia and her partner.  In the end, neither Sonia nor her partner effectively defended the claim brought by David and submitted no evidence to justify their earlier assertions.  The judge found in favour of David and concluded that Sonia  “by the repeated peddling of falsehoods about [David] and/or his wife, unduly influenced Gerald” to make a will which substantially marginalised David whilst attempting to minimise any challenge to the will by him.

Crucially in this case,  David was able to persuade the court that his sister’s actions involved the element of dishonesty. In an earlier case [Nesbitt v Nicholson [2014] All ER (D) 102 (Jan)] it was held that “If a person believes that he is telling the truth about a potential beneficiary then even if what he tells the testator is objectively untrue, the Will is not liable to be set aside on that ground alone” showing how difficult to prove because of that element.

*Lewison J (as he then was) in Edwards v Edwards [2007] 1387

These notes do not contain or constitute legal advice, and no reliance should be placed on them. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to speak to your usual contact at Maurice Turnor Gardner LLP.

Sophie Mazzier

Counsel

+44 (0)20 7786 8722 sophie.mazzier@mtgllp.com Download vCard↓

Sophie Mazzier has more than 30 years’ experience in Private Wealth advice and provides both technical and practical professional legal support to the firm.

Related articles

Maurice Turnor Gardner is shortlisted for a STEP Award

Read more

Maurice Turnor Gardner shortlisted in two categories at Chambers High Net Worth Awards 2022

Read more

The domicile debate

Read more

Extensive updates to the UK’s Trusts Registration Service

Read more

New global business mobility routes to be implemented on 11 April 2022

Read more
All articles
  • Who we are
  • What we do
  • How we work
  • What we think
  • Contact us
  • Sitemap
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Cookie policy
  • Interest policy
  • SRA transparency on fees
© 2022 Maurice Turnor Gardner LLP. All rights reserved
  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
Subscribe to the newsletter
Back to top↑

 

This website uses cookies to ensure the best possible user experience.

You can change the way cookies are used through your internet browser settings but can also update your preferences through settings.

For more information about cookies and the types of cookies we use please read our Cookies Policy.

MTG
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to protect the security of the site and to ensure that we can provide the best possible user experience. Cookies are small text files that are placed on your computer in order to track activity.

Our website distinguishes between cookies that are strictly necessary for the effective operation of the site and those that are not, such as analytical or third party cookies. We will only place cookies without your explicit consent where they are strictly necessary.

For more information about the specific types of cookies used, please read our Cookies Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.

Analytical cookies

This website uses Google Analytics to collect anonymous information such as the number of visitors to the site, and the most popular pages.

Keeping this cookie enabled helps us to improve our website.

Please enable Strictly Necessary Cookies first so that we can save your preferences!